HEMP DREAMS

There are two related movements that are based largely on deception. The first is the medical marijuana movement, and the second is the hemp movement.
The medical pot movement wants to get the drug legalized but only for medical use naturally, on a doctor's orders. This is deceptive because the purpose is ultimately nothing to do with medicine, and everything to do with getting a personal vice legalized. Oregon and California both have these laws in place, and both have repeatedly had doctors fined or have had their licenses suspended for handing out pot prescriptions for nearly any malady or excuse. The intent has nothing to do with the medical benefits of pot - which are real - but everything to do with a systematic attempt to legalize marijuana. The medical benefits of pot can be obtained without sucking carcinogenic smoke into your lungs, let alone legalizing it at any level.
The hemp movement has a similar problem with deception, but in this case it's a self deception. Hemp does have leaves that can be dried and smoked - which is why the hemp movement is inevitably and overwhelmingly part of the pot movement - but the leaves are few and or lower quality than marijuana specially grown for harvest to smoke. Hemp plants are essentially a single stalk with a few leaves on top, pot plants are a bushy, many branched plant with lots of leaves. That being said, legalizing hemp is a deliberate attempt to legalize growing marijuana, and a glimpse at the Seattle Hempfest gives a perfect example of this.
The marijuana leaf was everywhere. Brownies and other edibles with "hemp" in them were for sale at stands. Actual marijuana was visible in many areas, including potted plants and leaves worn like leis and hats. The leaf symbol was ubiquitous, showing their dedication to industrial and food use of hemp. American Digest has the goods, a pictorial essay of the 16th annual Seattle Hempfest. This smoke-wreathed event has been going on for sixteen years now, and although the entry has a warning banning narcotics, it was everywhere. It's like an Oktoberfest without a beer, says writer Vanderleun, although the "beer" was around:
The medical pot movement wants to get the drug legalized but only for medical use naturally, on a doctor's orders. This is deceptive because the purpose is ultimately nothing to do with medicine, and everything to do with getting a personal vice legalized. Oregon and California both have these laws in place, and both have repeatedly had doctors fined or have had their licenses suspended for handing out pot prescriptions for nearly any malady or excuse. The intent has nothing to do with the medical benefits of pot - which are real - but everything to do with a systematic attempt to legalize marijuana. The medical benefits of pot can be obtained without sucking carcinogenic smoke into your lungs, let alone legalizing it at any level.
The hemp movement has a similar problem with deception, but in this case it's a self deception. Hemp does have leaves that can be dried and smoked - which is why the hemp movement is inevitably and overwhelmingly part of the pot movement - but the leaves are few and or lower quality than marijuana specially grown for harvest to smoke. Hemp plants are essentially a single stalk with a few leaves on top, pot plants are a bushy, many branched plant with lots of leaves. That being said, legalizing hemp is a deliberate attempt to legalize growing marijuana, and a glimpse at the Seattle Hempfest gives a perfect example of this.
The marijuana leaf was everywhere. Brownies and other edibles with "hemp" in them were for sale at stands. Actual marijuana was visible in many areas, including potted plants and leaves worn like leis and hats. The leaf symbol was ubiquitous, showing their dedication to industrial and food use of hemp. American Digest has the goods, a pictorial essay of the 16th annual Seattle Hempfest. This smoke-wreathed event has been going on for sixteen years now, and although the entry has a warning banning narcotics, it was everywhere. It's like an Oktoberfest without a beer, says writer Vanderleun, although the "beer" was around:
Actually, dogs do get in even if they don't exactly run free. Everything else seem to be expressly prohibited. And to judge by the furtive deals going on down by the breakwater, the "Drug Free" zone is an illusion. The drugs here are anything but free. Ditto the burritos, bongs, and hemp brownies. Other than that, the crowd -- running to type and overwhelming predictability -- underscores the last line. No matter what else may be going on, This is not a free zone. It's a zone bounded by ritual and tedium.The first picture past the warning sign is the most hilarious to me: getting in takes a five dollar donation... but you can't get in without donating. Commenters discussed the event:
I no longer remember, if I ever did, exactly what we had in mind at the San Francisco Acid Tests or the Human Be-In, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't anything as obvious as all this. We were, I believe, trying to "change the world," not sell it a hemp t-shirt.
There are a lot of dirty, ignorant, delightfully stupid white people in Seattle. But it's still a great town. Give my regards to the Blue Moon on 45th.The final comment when I posted this was a comparison between pot being illegal and Valium being legal. My response to this is always the same: I wish people weren't hooked on Valium either and it's criminal how doctors hand it out. The argument presented like this can be restated thusly:
-by Jack Nigh
This is the type of religion you end up with when you think you don't have one.
-by Vexorg
I went to a New England liberal arts college full of stoners like that, and yes, all their ideas about human nature and social change are BS. However, my friends and I were different, liberal, yes, radical even...but sober and articulate. I don't think I have to be too hopeless that there are more of us out there doing brilliant things in art, science and politics.
-by Anonymous
About 8 years ago my 9yo son and I were riding our bikes along the waterfront and found ourselves in the middle of this mess. We made it through from end to end and I was concerned about his exposure to these people. I watched him as we pushed our bikes through the crowd and he was obviously scared ****less and when we got through I asked him what he thought.
" Those people were pathetic" he said.
I give him 10 bonus points for the correct use of the word.
Just proud of the boy.
From a 60's hippie
-by Rick
"This horrible thing is already legal, why not more?"Which is no way of setting policy. I knew several people in school who were bright, creative, and had a quick, ready mind and clear memory. They got to smoking pot "once in a while" for entertainment and to relax, and by the time I graduated, they were ruined. They had no memory, no taste, no creativity, their minds were dulled by the constant use of drugs that they only used sometimes for relaxation.
Pot makes people stupid. It is addictive, although not physically for most people, and almost nobody just smokes pot once in a while, not in the end. What's worse, recent studies have demonstrated that not only is marijuana a cancer-causing agent (gee, deliberately sucking smoke into your lungs is bad for you? Who knew?), but that it can cause brain damage and schizophrenia. It destroys motivation and ambition, restraint, and logical capacity. And all the while it makes you feel smarter, more creative, and freer.
Yet in Seattle, if you have an official event, the police look the other way. Sure, they clearly are carrying a controlled substance and selling it. Sure, those kids are underage. Who cares, really? They are harmless. They aren't hurting anyone else, except the rest of society that has to support the waste of space a pot user often turns into.Hemp was a great plant, with many uses and industrial properties that it can be relied upon for... in the 19th century. Today, hemp's uses have been replaced by superior products that do everything hemp did far better and cheaper. The hemp movement pretends no advances in any product have replaced hemp and we're keeping ourselves from the wonder plant of amazing productivity and cheap products! That was true, in 1933, but it's not true any more. But then, the entire movement has nothing to do with hemp, in the end. It's just an attempt to do an end run around the marijuana laws.






6 Comments:
While I agree with you that medical marijuana is largely just a thinly veiled attempt to move legalization of all types forward, I'm not so convinced in the case of industrial hemp. Some of the places where the support for industrial hemp is strongest is in agricultural areas. North Dakota, for example, is becoming increasingly agressive in decriminalizing hemp production. They have legally distinguished 'hemp' as a seperate substance from 'marijuana' and given their farmers permission to grow it without first obtaining permission from the DEA. The North Dakota people who are exerting political pressure to get this passed are not likely to be the same type of people you'd encounter at the Seattle Hempfest. These are farmers who see an opportunity to grow a crop and take it to market. They aren't tie-dyed freaks wanting to get lit, they just want the federal government to leave them alone to pursue their livelihood.
You are correct in pointing out that advances have been made since hemp production was outlawed, but that doesn't mean hemp is a useless crop. If that were the case, it wouldn't be grown in markets where it is legal to do so. It is no longer a good choice for using to make rope and twine, but with market development hemp could still be a superior alternative to wood in the production of paper. For many uses, it is has equal value to cotton as a fabric, and can produce more useable material on a given acre compared to cotton.
As far as legalization goes, I can agree with you that medical marijuana is a major step in that direction. However, I do believe industrial hemp can rationally stand as an issue on its own, seperate from the legalization debate.
I admittedly favor legalization anyway, so perhaps I'm just unconsciously biased in this regard. I was a casual pot user for years before deciding to start a family, and I led a productive and fulfilling life during that time. Most of the adults I know who still use marijuana are socially indistinguishable from non-users, you could not pick them out of a crowd. I admit there are plenty of stereotypical stoner burnouts, but I disagree with your supposition that "almost nobody just smokes pot once in a while". Depending on which polls you trust, between 1/3 to 1/2 of the country have tried it at least once, and most of those did not become chronic users.
Also, in regards to the link between marijuana use and schizophrenia, doesn't that still apply only to people with a predisposition to schizophrenia? (itself a poorly understood and often misdiagnosed disease claimed to effect about one half of one percent of the population)
And wasn't the study in question focused on adolescants?
"It destroys motivation and ambition, restraint, and logical capacity."
Yup. Those were the most salient traits in pot-smokers that I knew. Why grown people continue to use it, I don't understand. It does seem rather pathetic to me. And since no one knows beforehand whether he'll be one of the ones to fall into dependency, it's better to just not experiment.
All of these arguments against marijuana can be applied to alcohol. Yet alcohol is legal and marijuana is not. I still don't understand why. Those who argue against keeping marijuana illegal should also, logically, argue for a return to prohibition.
Arguing that since we have one bad thing we ought to have another was dealt with in the article.
anonymous - the only reference to another "bad thing" regarding drugs I see in the article was to Valium, which is a legal drug, but only through prescription. Alcohol is a legal drug that can be purchased "over-the-counter," in a manner of speaking. And if someone considers alcohol a "bad thing" in the same league as marijuana, hemp, or valium, I'd like to at least hear it said, because so often it's the "drug" that gets a free pass in these legalization debates.
Actually my point in that section was to point out that the argument that since we have something that is damaging to people then we ought to have more is a poor argument indeed. Valium was the example, alcohol and cigarettes fit that as well.
It's a poor argument, lacking any intellectual or rational merit.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home